Bellow are two of my source in APA format. Both show summarized data and don't show how the data is analyzed
Nate Dorr. (September 2010). TRADITIONS AND ACHIEVEMENTS IN AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION. In Minnesota department of Employment and Economic Developement. Retrieved April 10,2012, from
http://www.positivelyminnesota.com/Data_Publications/Employment_Review_Magazine/September_2010_Edition/Traditions_Achievements_in_American_Indian_Education.aspx.
Nate Dorr. (September 2010). TRADITIONS AND ACHIEVEMENTS IN AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION. In Minnesota department of Employment and Economic Developement. Retrieved April 10,2012, from
http://www.positivelyminnesota.com/Data_Publications/Employment_Review_Magazine/September_2010_Edition/Traditions_Achievements_in_American_Indian_Education.aspx.
Cross, S. L., & Day, A. G. (2008). American Indian Grand Families: Eight Adolescent and Grandparent Dyads Share Perceptions on Various Aspects of the Kinship Care Relationship. Journal Of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity In Social Work, 17(1), 82-100. doi:10.1080/15313200801906559
Hi Abdi,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the two information resources that present statistical information on your population.
What are the differences between the two? What are the reasons why the state of Minnesota collected the data that they did, versus the reasons why the researchers Cross and Day collected the data that they did? What points are each resource trying to make with their data?
I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Professor Wexelbaum